Francesco Passaro vs Nicholas David Ionel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W L W L
Form
W W W W W W W L W LHead To Head: Passaro 2 - 0 Ionel
They have played 5 sets in total, with Passaro winning 4 and Ionel winning 1. The last match between Passaro and Ionel was at the Vicenza Challenger, 01-06-2023, Second, Clay with Francesco Passaro getting the victory 6-3 1-6 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Francesco Passaro | 2 |
| Nicholas David Ionel | 0 |
Vicenza Challenger(01-06-2023)
6
3
1
6
7
6
| Passaro | Stats | Ionel |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (9-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (20-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 101 | Ranking | 356 |
| 89 | Highest Rank | 184 |
| 24 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 17 |
| 57% (183-137) | Career Total W/L | 64% (310-178) |
| $559,355 | Career Prize Money | $3,475 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Li VS Gauff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Darderi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 1-6 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Francesco Passaro
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
83%
(
73 of
88)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 19 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:41:12 | Average Match Time | 1:41:12 |
| 65% (83/127) | 1st Serve % | 75% (104/139) |
| 73% (61/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (60/104) |
| 59% (26/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (19/35) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 43% (60/139) | Return Points Win % | 31% (40/127) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Francesco Passaro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Francesco Passaro
69%
(
101 of
147)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
39%
(
57 of
147)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
129
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(6) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Juan Bautista Torres
72%
(
70 of
97)
1st Serve %
79%
(
72 of
91)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
52 of
72)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Francesco Passaro
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Andrea Collarini
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Francesco Passaro
72%
(
75 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
71 of
100)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
31 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
50
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Francesco Passaro
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
8
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
78 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
122)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
9
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
122
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Nicholas David Ionel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Liam Broady
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Andrey Chepelev
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Tim Handel
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Alex Martinez
88%
(
75 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
82%
(
56 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Florian Broska
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Alessandro Bellifemine
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (183/137) | Win/Loss | 64% (310/178) |
| 55% (421/338) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (674/440) |
| 53% (3713/3338) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5515/4692) |
| 51% (33/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (54/31) |
| 60% (146/96) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (255/140) |
| 36% (4/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 919 | Aces Total | 574 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 608 | Total Double Faults | 1003 |
| 1:35:54 | Average Match Time | 1:42:44 |
| 271.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 470.81 |
| 66% (13836/21000) | 1st Serve % | 68% (20574/30480) |
| 67% (9260/13836) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (13030/20574) |
| 52% (3700/7163) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4925/9906) |
| 43% (918/2159) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1781/3694) |
| 41% (8595/21146) | Return Points Win % | 44% (13745/31052) |
| 41% (7/10) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 50% (5/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 50% (14/14) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (95/71) | Challenger W/L | 46% (52/61) |
| 63% (62/37) | Futures W/L | 71% (255/104) |
| 57% (181/315) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (306/483) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 46% (41/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (61/114) |
| 53% (60/114) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (85/143) |
| 83% (178/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (305/271) |
| 17% (178/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (305/34) |
| 25% (142/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (181/38) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
